Monday 24 September 2012

MAM



en.png



Questions: What observations can you make about this relationship between what happens inside behind the scenes

The feeling that I got from taking an inside view Musee de Lart Moderne is that every person in the MAM is connected with everyone else. To explain this further every department showed an interest in what is happening in other departments. It's like walking into a family. Communications knew what was happening with curatorial, and the director of the museum was in touch with the events department. It was great to see everyone working together. Pertaining to the space in the museum it's interesting how space changes so quickly. As one of the speakers stated in our tour, museums are ever changing and nothing is permanent. I almost prefer the buzz to an instillation before it is premiered because it is the excitement of not knowing what to expect versus walking in and looking at a final project. Being behind the scenes at a museum is like getting a secret privilege into a world that people don't often see.

How does it relay to what is displayed outside in the public space?

The public has a perception of what they expect to see when walking into an exhibit. Clean polished finalized detailed explanations of each piece along with fully functioning instillations or performance pieces. Before I took a look into what goes into making an exhibits, I was like the general public I didn't take the time to wonder how the space came to be or what was put into promoting art. To me exhibits sometimes felt quite boring, like I was a product of something that was generically churned out. Like a mechanic wheel. This is why the most interesting part of our tour was to view the exhibitions before they became perfect, and to see that there are faults.

How do the contemporary shows that are in the process of being installed call our attention to the issue of insiders and outsiders inclusion or exclusion?

Both exhibitions dealt with the themes of inclusion and exclusion. Bertille Baks show was entitled "Circuits". Its a project based exhibition which takes a look into the lives and habitats of certain parts of society that are not often thought or talked about. The first being "o quatrieme" is about nuns living in a convent. To even begin this project there is a certain level of exclusivity. In being in a convent a nun is giving there life to religion. What Bak is doing is allowing outsiders to take a look inside. The same goes for her second project which is about gypsy's she lets us into their lives as we take a look at the traditions and history that this migrating community has. The whole show follows the theme of allowing the public to see what was should be private.  

What was made visible to you today that is usually invisible to museum, visitor?

Today we were allowed behind the velvet rope which so often prohibits the outside from seeing the true inner workings of a museum. What we saw was the creation of a space, the sound checks, how different pieces are chose and hung. How the curator decides where certain pieces should be put and works hand in hand with the artist so the best possible outcome can happen. We also saw what goes into promoting an artist and how they are chosen. Mostly I was struck by the amount of security that is put into keeping the work safe but also exclusive. I felt that I got a better appreciation for the space, and the amount of effort that is put into promoting and creating a museum. Especially the premier of the new logo, it was interesting to me how through communication and keeping the common theme of the logo the museum is able to promote certain exhibitions.

How does some contemporary art reveal or display what is often hidden?

The beauty of contemporary art is that there are no rules an artist can do or create what they please. Often I find with contemporary art there is always a purpose or a cause that the work is created for. No longer are the days of pretty pictures but instead artists create because they have a message. This is why through art we can often learn more about society than is expected. For example the instillation videos we saw of parents teaching their children to queue. I was completely unaware that until I saw this art piece that queuing was a huge part of life in many countries and learning how to queue correctly and politely was something that all parts of a community needed to know. Art revealed that to me. Contemporary art is like a game, it hides the message that it contains, and it is up to the viewer to find the answer.    

Monday 17 September 2012

Wim Delvoye "Au Louvre"


















My previous impressions of Wim Delvoye's work was that he's known for making quite bizarre statement pieces such as his tattooed pigs. So when this assignment was given I was a little apprehensive of what he might construct in the space of Napoleon's apartments. Initially my reaction was to the opulence of the apartments. Having never stepped foot in them before they are filled with detail and fit for any royal or important figurehead. 

Delvoye's silver swirling sculptures were what I first noticed. They oddly complimented the space, the use of texture in the sculpture worked with the ornate chandeliers. Although the viewer could tell that the material used to make them was very different to the material used in the apartments it was not an eyesore to look at them as part of the room. The overall presence of the work did not faze me as a problem. I felt as though they brought a little life into the apartments. 

The narratives in Delvoye's work were hard to link together. On one hand you have the story of Chloe and Daphnis depicted in an intertwined sculpture and on the other there are elaborate depictions of twisted dump trucks. I fail to understand the narrative as a whole, but what I can conclude is that each piece has its own statement to make whether it is meant to reference royalty or tell us something about the space. Each piece seems to have its own story. For example the bunny slippers, when I first saw the animals I assumed that they were game animals shot and stuffed by some person who inhabited the apartments. When I looked closer at the label I noticed that they were slippers and not full sized rabbits. It was sort of a play on royalty for me. Bunny slippers are under the connotation of being soft and comfortable that old people wear while shuffling around their apartments, and here Delvoye presented real rabbits made into slippers I suppose under the same connotation, but on a more luxurious scale. 


The context of this show is essentially what I described earlier, a grand setting with an artist who is trying to make it slightly more human, by bringing new pieces of work in and giving life again. I felt that because some of Delvoye's pieces were objects such as pigs or trucks, even though there were beautiful, I was able to relate to them. As Fred Wilson says in his interview that creating an exhibition is about a relationship between the space and the viewer, and how his goal was to make the viewer talk and question. I find that Delvoye was able to do this with his work, and where he chose to place them within the space. 

Delvoye's work will always be considered valuable just because of who he is, but because of the setting of where the work was placed the meaning has become more valuable. The pieces are no longer just bunny slippers they are bunny slippers in napoleons apartments in the Louvre. That in itself gives meaning to a piece simply because of the setting that it is in. 







I suppose the impact on the collection would be how the viewer see's the space and the impact they receive from the work. Macdonald speaks frequently about the relationship between collecting and people, that the objects are frozen once collected. However, when placed in a museum setting they are re-animated and brought to life. In this case the Delvoye's work becomes part of the timeless work that is Napoleons apartments. 

The timeline of the apartment is fractured, because you are mixing old with new or past with present. This makes the exhibition temporary and raise the question can these pieces of art stand the test of time like the apartment and its content? Overall I enjoyed the exhibition I thought it brought life to the opulent apartments and raised questions on what was old and what was new.